ORCID
D. H. Engelke: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4517-4365
N. J. Pearse: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7583-9845
F. M. Correa: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6708-9316
F. O. Skae: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2450-8231
Keywords
National Culture, Sustainability, ESG, Resource-Based Theory; Natural-Resource-Based Theory, Institutional Theory
Abstract
Modelling a dataset of 5230 globally listed firms through two statistical approaches reflecting the primary principles of Natural-Resource-Based Theory and Institutional Theory, respectively, this study provides evidence that sustainability initiatives developed by firms are being rewarded in the form of improved Corporate Financial Performance (CFP). Culture has a significant influence on both firm sustainability performance, captured in ESG ratings, and CFP and also interacts with other variables, including industry sector and socio-economic development of a firm’s markets. This study is unique in hypothesising and statistically proving that sustainability is a mechanism that activates the potential of culture to produce CFP. Natural-Resource-Based Theory (NRBT) and Institutional Theory (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983) provide complementary explanations for the relationship between the culture of a firm and its CFP being mediated by sustainability, effectively determining firms’ approach to the use of their resources in a sustainable or unsustainable way. Certain relationships between culture, sustainability performance, and CFP, however, are better explained by Institutional Theory than NRBT.
Recommended Citation
Engelke, D., Pearse, N., Correa, F., & Skae, F. (2024). The Relationship between Culture, Sustainable Use of Resources, and Financial Performance: An Institutional and Natural-Resource-Based Perspective. Economic and Business Review, 26(2), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1335
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
Included in
Behavioral Economics Commons, International Business Commons, Strategic Management Policy Commons